Angry MPs join calls for secret list of those
involved as banks and pharmaceutical firms are linked to rogue private
investigators
Banks and pharmaceutical companies are on a secret list of blue-chip firms that hired private investigators who break the law, The Independent has learned.
The revelation that firms from two of this country’s biggest
industries may have commissioned corrupt PIs – without facing
prosecution – will fuel concerns that corporations potentially involved
in the unlawful trade in private information have so far escaped proper
investigation
This newspaper has previously revealed that
law firms, insurance companies and financial services organisations
have used PIs for years to obtain a range of private data.
Information
on the banks and pharmaceutical companies is contained in an explosive
list of corrupt PIs’ clients handed to a parliamentary committee by the
Serious Organised Crime Agency (Soca). The list of 101 clients also
includes some wealthy individuals.
Following weeks of damaging revelations in
The Independent,
Soca finally bowed to political pressure earlier this week and
privately released to MPs the historical details which its investigators
ignored for years.
However, the agency has classified
the material as secret to safeguard individuals’ human rights and
protect the “financial viability of major organisations by tainting them
with public association with criminality”.
The decision
comes as the newspaper industry is at the centre of the largest criminal
investigation in British history over practices including the hiring of
corrupt PIs.
Asked this evening if the classified
information contained details of banks and pharmaceutical companies,
Keith Vaz, chairman of the Home Affairs Select Committee, said: “This
affects all manner of organisations.”
Mark Lewis, the
lawyer who represents the Milly Dowler family and a long-time scourge of
Fleet Street, said: “Consistency demands that the same rules apply to
all, whether you run a newspaper, a pharmaceutical company or a law
firm.
“As soon as you depart from the equal applicability of law to all, then the law really does become an ass.”
Trevor
Pearce, the director-general of Soca, decided to classify the details
of blue-chip companies, in line with Cabinet Office guidelines about
sensitive material.
He demanded the list be “kept in a
safe in a locked room, within a secure building and that the document
should not be left unattended on a desk at any time”.
However,
in what would amount to a remarkable snub, the committee is so angry
with Soca that it is considering releasing the information under
parliamentary privilege.
Mr Vaz said: “We will come to a
view as to whether or not we will publish this list. These events took
place up to five years ago. Those companies or individuals who either
instructed private investigators to break the law or did nothing to stop
them must be held to account.”
It is understood other
members of the committee are furious that they are being asked to
participate in the cover-up. One source said: “This is bigger than the
phone-hacking scandal and the committee does not want to be held
accountable when all this comes out in the wash.”
Last
month The Independent revealed that Soca compiled a dossier in 2008 that
outlined how firms, individuals and organised crime bosses hired
criminal PIs.
The investigators broke the law to obtain
sensitive information, including mobile phone records, bank statements
and details of witnesses under police protection.
Soca
was analysing intelligence from mostly Scotland Yard investigations that
had also failed to prosecute the offenders for the most serious
offences – and completely ignored the blue-chip clients who may have
profited from their crimes.
The report – which showed the
practices went far wider than the newspaper industry – was dismissed by
Lord Justice Leveson, who considered it fell outside the narrow terms
of reference for his inquiry into the media.
One of five
police investigations reviewed by Soca found private detectives
listening in to targets’ phone calls in real time. During another police
inquiry, the Soca report said officers found a document entitled “The
Blagger’s Manual”, which outlined methods of accessing personal
information by calling companies, banks, HM Revenue and Customs,
councils, utility providers and the NHS.
Illegal
practices identified by Soca investigators went well beyond the
relatively simple crime of voicemail hacking and also included police
corruption, computer hacking and perverting the course of justice.
Meanwhile,
in an extraordinary joint admission on the Soca website, Mr Pearce and
Commander Neil Basu of the Metropolitan Police admit the agency sat for
years on evidence of criminality, until it was finally forced to act in
May 2011 by former British Army intelligence officer Ian Hurst whose
computer was allegedly hacked by corrupt private investigators.
Mr
Hurst told The Independent: “For reasons that remain unclear, the
Leveson Inquiry did not touch the sides with regard to the police. In
the final analysis, law enforcement agencies are going to have to
justify why they conspired for years to protect the offenders and their
clients, which extend way beyond the media.”
The joint
statement also failed to address why Soca has still not passed all its
historical evidence to Scotland Yard, which is currently investigating
the crimes that the agency ignored.
Tom Watson, the
campaigning Labour MP, said: “Why is the Met Police not in possession of
all the information it would usually require to investigate criminal
wrongdoing? Why did Soca not give all the physical evidence in the form
of the original hard drives to the Met?
“The Yard and
Soca need to provide an urgent explanation as to why the latter is still
sitting on a bank of data that any decent police investigator would
require to do a proper job.”
Rob Wilson, a senior
Conservative MP, has written to Home Secretary Theresa May calling on
her to sack Mr Pearce and Soca chairman Sir Ian Andrews over their
refusal to publish the list of blue-chip clients.
A Soca
spokesman said: “Trevor Pearce provided the chair of the committee with
further confidential information on 22 July 2013. Soca is unable to
comment further on that detail. However, as stated in the DG’s covering
letter – which is published on the Soca website – the information
provided does not allege, either expressly or by implication, that the
individuals and companies named in it, or any individuals working for
those companies, have or even may have committed a criminal offence.”