External Security Assesment is important for all Network and applications

The most common solution to external network security assessments is scan, scan, scan…and then scan some more

One of the most common vulnerability assessment activities for all companies of all sizes is an external scan, typically targeting internet-facing websites. Because we service the vulnerability assessment and penetration testing needs of large enterprises, we know “you know” that scanning external-facing network resources is important, and an obvious high priority. But we also challenge you to understand that scanning alone is not enough, unless all you really want is a checkmark for an audit of one kind or another.

A complete job of assessing the hardness of your external network includes multiple steps. Here are four of the main steps that you should be familiar with:

1. Anonymous information gathering to discover all Internet-facing assets a hacker could identify as potential entry-points into your network
2. Scanning of your internet-available network access points and web servers for known vulnerabilities (non-credentialed)
3. Verifying scan-result findings through in-depth manual pen testing attack techniques (both credentialed and non-credentialed)
4. Providing deeply informed remediation guidance and advisory services for identified/verified vulnerabilities

Why is BriskInfoSec approached to discuss external vulnerability assessment work with large enterprises?

BriskInfoSec is approached by our large enterprise clients to assess the security of their external-facing network assets for many reasons, but chief among them are dissatisfaction with their own internal tools, their present provider, and/or their own internal team’s ability to effectively manage all of their external testing work efficiently over time in a consistent and professional manner. These kinds of situations frequently result in an assignment for someone in a company’s security staff to search out alternatives; which then open up an opportunity for BriskInfoSec to present our highly-disciplined, in-depth approach to assessing the security of their external-facing network assets as compared to their present approach.

What do these companies discover when comparing BriskInfoSec approach to external security testing with their own present approach?

Because BriskInfoSec is driven by an across-the-board corporate culture that’s passionate about delivering the highest-value findings and recommendations possible, we do more than the basic steps, we do all the steps on your behalf; and then even more than that. If you assign mid-to-low-level-importance projects to others, fine, we see that frequently. But if you have a set of high-value software assets or critical points-of-entry into your network, working with BriskInfoSec always begins with an education about scanning versus penetration testing:

• Scanning and penetration testing are not the same thing, no matter how much the marketing folks working for the scanning tools manufacturers and scanning service providers make it sound that way
• Scanning is never enough, it is only an initial step in the entire assessment process
• Just the scanning step alone done effectively needs multiple scanning tools and multiple over-lapping scans run against the same resources in order to accomplish a thorough job of the scanning step
• Scanning the same resources  with different tools (as just recommended) naturally returns different results in different data formats
• Correlating and normalizing all this desperate scanning data requires special technology: like our proprietary CorrelatedVM™ platform that’s used by all of our pen testers and available (in part) to you through our CorrelatedVM Portal at no additional cost
• Scanning identifies potential vulnerabilities, and the different scanners may recommend different remediation actions – but BriskInfoSec’s CorrelatedVM platform fixes that problem as it correlates and normalizes all the scanning data from multiple scanning products and multiple rounds of scanning into the best set of recommended remediation actions
• Potential vulnerabilities identified by the initial scanning effort need to be verified by experts to eliminate false positives, and to thoroughly analyze the remainder, while also probing for any unidentified vulnerabilities the scanners could not find – this is work that only an expert pen testing company like BriskInfoSec can deliver 

In-depth pen testing to final reporting of findings and recommendations is what sets BriskInfoSec apart, and why we are given the critical responsibility of assessing the security of your most high-value/high-risk external-facing network assets.

The power of CorrelatedVM comes at no cost to you and provides real benefits that only BriskInfoSec can deliver

CorrelatedVM™, our proprietary vulnerability assessment and pen testing management platform, will be utilized for your external network penetration testing service when you hire BriskInfoSec. The CorrelatedVM platform and your complimentary access to its SaaS-based customer portal set our deep-dive pen test work and customer-facing deliverables light years apart from all other pen test services. This one-of-a-kind, powerful platform has been continually enhanced and used exclusively by BriskInfoSec’s elite team of pen test consultants on every pen test engagement for over a decade now.


Once you see our team in action with the CorrelatedVM platform, and what CorrelatedVM can offer your organization in the way of automating and disciplining your external vulnerability assessment efforts, you’ll realize how it solves presently unsolvable problems that will profoundly benefit all of your vulnerability management programs going forward.

Contact us for conduct external security testing against your applications and Network with affordable price info@briskinfosec.com

Is Anyone Really Responsible for Your Company's Data Security?

Protecting a company's critical information is a value proposition. Trade secrets, confidential business plans, and operational security depend on it. Losing that kind of information can mean a plunge in stock price and market share. So who's responsible for information security in your company?
To find out, I like to ask questions. But when I put the question to top management, well, they're busy — not their problem, that's for sure — and they refer me to the chief information officer or the chief technology officer. So I knock on their doors and put the same question to them. Our job, they say, is making stuff work. If the stuff doesn't work, that's our fault. But security? They refer me to the chief information security officer, but she works for the CIO, who doesn't much like to hear what's wrong with the system he built. Besides, she says, I have nothing to do with who gets access to the system. I don't write the rules. And (she looks around nervously: you won't quote me on this, will you?) my budget is a joke.
So I walk down the hall and knock on the general counsel's door. Cyber security my problem? he says. No, no, he laughs; I write the contracts that lay off the liability for cyber security on our contractors. And insofar as some of that liability stays here, it's a technical problem.
Who's left? I walk down the hall and visit the HR director, who is trying hard to conceal her opinion that, for asking her whether she has any responsibility for any kind of security, I must be the stupidest guy on Earth. Nevertheless I persist. You control the HR manual, don't you? She does. And the manual contains lots of access rules, doesn't it? She concedes the point. And weren't you the chief opponent of the CISO's plan to require a click-through log-on banner stating that information on the company's IT system belongs to the company and can be monitored? Suddenly she remembers her next appointment.
Try the experiment in your company. If you get answers like this, it means that nobody in your company is responsible for information security. The truth is, unless all these people understand they own a piece of the problem and can be brought to deal with it together, you cannot manage information security.
Verizon's newest data breach investigations report for 2013 tells us — yet again — that cyber security depends on people as much as technology. Breaches are nearly always caused by multiple factors, and people are nearly always one of them. In this latest report, based on a larger-than-ever sample, 29% of breaches involved social tactics like getting employees to click on fake emails (phishing). And gullible employees aren't the only problem. Year after year Verizon has been reporting that most intrusions — 78% this year — are "low difficulty" and could have been prevented by simple or mid-level security measures. Failure to implement patches for weeks and months on end is a common problem. This is a management failure, not a technological problem.
When intruders get in to corporate systems, they tend to stay in. We still see smash-and-grab hacks, mostly after personal information, but they are becoming less common, especially when the goal is stealing corporate information. Most breaches take time to discover — usually months rather than weeks, and sometimes longer. In a major release early this year, the forensic firm Mandiant reported solid massive Chinese hacking of private sector clients — and showed that the median period of the intrusion was nearly a year. Often such breaches are discovered only by third parties — like the FBI or the media. Not a pleasant experience.
So why do so many companies treat cyber security as merely a technical problem that can be pushed down into the IT department?
Cyber security involves legal issues, human resources practices and policies, operational configurations, and technical expertise. But while each of these silo chieftains — the general counsel, the HR director, the chief operations officer, and the IT director — owns a piece of the problem, some of them don't know it, and none of them owns the whole thing. This makes information security a risk management and governance challenge, because unless these people attack the challenge together under a C-suite mandate, it can't be managed effectively. Unfortunately this rarely happens.
Information security cannot involve not locking down information that must move quickly. It does involve figuring out where information must move, and where it must not move. And above all, it means making rules that don't stifle creativity in the business. Protecting critical information protects corporate value and is a core responsibility of the board and executive management. Best-in class companies view information security as a value proposition — not merely as a deduction from the bottom line.